Sister’s right in ancestral property upheld by virtue of Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act and Hindu Succession Act CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Published on April 6, 2019By Devika Leave a comment Bombay High Court: Sandeep K. Shinde, J., upheld the order of the first Appellate Court whereby it reversed the trial court’s decision and held that the sister (respondent herein) was entitled to a right in the ancestral property along with her brother (appellant herein). One Waman Bala died in 1944 leaving behind the parties herein and their mother. The character of the suit property was ancestral. After Waman’s death, the name of the brother was alone entered into the records of rights of the suit property. Their mother left the house in 1972 in a state of insanity and her whereabouts were not known. The sister, apprehending alienation of the property by the brother, filed a suit claiming her rights in the same. The suit was defended by the brother and the trial court dismissed the suit. The sister challenged the said decision and the first Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s decision. Aggrieved thereby, the brother filed the present appeal. While discussing the law in the subject, the High Court referred to Section 3 (devolution of property) of the Hindu Women’s Right of Property Act, 1937. As per Section 3(2) and (3), if a Hindu governed by any school of law other than Dayabhaga dies, his right in Hindu Joint family property devolves on his wife with limited interest which is known as the Hindu Woman’s Estate. Also as per sub-section (1) of Section 14 (property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 a Hindu female is a full owner of any property possessed by her, and this includes all modes of acquisition including inheritance or device [Explanation to Section 14(1)]. Thus, observed the Court: “the limited interest or Hindu Woman’s Estate [acquired under Section 3 of the Hindu Women’s Right Property Act] shall be held by the widow as full owner in terms of provisions of Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956″. In the case at hand, the Court stated: “it is not in dispute that mother of the plaintiff and the defendant had died after 1956 and, therefore, her interest in the property would devolve as per the scheme in terms of Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Thus, her property will devolve upon her sons, daughters and husband.” On the holistic view of the matter, the Court found no error with the order of the first Appellate Court. Therefore, the present appeal was dismissed. [Jagannath Waman Undre v. Yamunabai Sitaram Kadam, Second Appeal No. 126 of 2018, decided on 01-04-2019] Share this: Click to print (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)159Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)159Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)More Related Succession to a Hindu male dying intestate will vest only in the widow excluding the daughters January 16, 2016 In “Case Briefs” Gau HC | S.6 of Hindu Succession Act doesn’t apply to Dayabhaga school law; Proviso to S.6 (1) or S.6(5) not applicable in case of fraudulent transaction March 4, 2019 In “Case Briefs” Widow who remarries does not lose rights over late husband’s property July 23, 2015 In “Case Briefs” TAGGED WITH: Ancestral Property, Hindu Woman’s Estate, Section 14 (property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property), Section 3 (devolution of property) of the Hindu Women’s Right of Property Act Avatar Written by Devika Post navigation PREVIOUS STORY CCI | All India Sugar Trade Association alleged for circulating “price sensitive information” amongst cartel members NEXT STORY Del HC | Maintenance under S. 125 CrPC to be ordinarily awarded from date of application; award from date of order is exception WE RECOMMEND CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Application seeking condonation of delay and main proceeding cannot be clubbed together along with adduced evidence under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS HP HC | Court grants liberty and protection to similarly placed stone-crushers to avoid multiplicity of litigation CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Free Medical Services and Employment ordered for Acid Attack Victim JOIN THE DISCUSSION Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked Comment * Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. POPULAR ON SCC ONLINE BLOG CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Del HC | Conviction for S. 138 NI Act offence reversed where complainant incapable of extending the subject loan CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Cal HC | Authorised signatory not to be prosecuted under S. 138 NI Act if the company not arraigned as accused CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Chh HC | The three ingredients under S. 107 IPC required to be fulfilled for framing of charge under S. 306 IPC CASES REPORTEDSUPREME COURT CASES 2019 SCC Vol. 2 March 7, 2019 Part 4 LAW SCHOOL NEWSLIVE BLOGGING The Tenth NLU Antitrust Law Moot Court Competition – Live Blog MOST COMMENTED HOT OFF THE PRESSNEWS Rafale Deal: SC reserves order on admissibility of the ‘leaked’ documents CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Jha HC | Mere absence of a ticket with the deceased will not negative claim of being a bonafide passenger, Court reiterates LEGISLATION UPDATESNOTIFICATIONS GST | Decisions by GST Council in 34th meeting regarding GST Rate on “Real Estate Sector” CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Madras HC | Pollachi Rape Case | Court refuses to quash summons issued against Editor of Nakkheeran Publications CASE BRIEFSHIGH COURTS Del HC | Conviction for S. 138 NI Act offence reversed where complainant incapable of extending the subject loan TAGS #SCC Aadhaar Amendment Anticipatory Bail Appeal Appointment Appointment Of Judges Appointments Arbitration Bail Cases Reported CBI Compensation Conviction Corruption Cruelty Data Protection Divorce Election Evidence FIR Fundamental Rights GNLU GST Human Rights Interpretation Investigation Jurisdiction Maintenance Marriage MoU Murder NHRC Pension Privacy Rape RBI Reservation Right To Information SEBI Section 482 Crpc Sentence Supreme Court Supreme Court Cases Transfer Disclaimer : The content of this Blog are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the personal views of EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause. © 2018 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. ff notification icon

Bombay High Court: Sandeep K. Shinde, J., upheld the order of the first Appellate Court whereby it reversed the trial court’s decision and held that the sister (respondent herein) was entitled to a right in the ancestral property along with her brother (appellant herein).

One Waman Bala died in 1944 leaving behind the parties herein and their mother. The character of the suit property was ancestral. After Waman’s death, the name of the brother was alone entered into the records of rights of the suit property. Their mother left the house in 1972 in a state of insanity and her whereabouts were not known. The sister, apprehending alienation of the property by the brother, filed a suit claiming her rights in the same. The suit was defended by the brother and the trial court dismissed the suit. The sister challenged the said decision and the first Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s decision. Aggrieved thereby, the brother filed the present appeal.

While discussing the law in the subject, the High Court referred to Section 3 (devolution of property) of the Hindu Women’s Right of Property Act, 1937. As per Section 3(2) and (3), if a Hindu governed by any school of law other than Dayabhaga dies, his right in Hindu Joint family property devolves on his wife with limited interest which is known as the Hindu Woman’s Estate. Also as per sub-section (1) of Section 14 (property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 a Hindu female is a full owner of any property possessed by her, and this includes all modes of acquisition including inheritance or device [Explanation to Section 14(1)].

Thus, observed the Court: “the limited interest or Hindu Woman’s Estate [acquired under Section 3 of the Hindu Women’s Right Property Act] shall be held by the widow as full owner in terms of provisions of Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956″.

In the case at hand, the Court stated: “it is not in dispute that mother of the plaintiff and the defendant had died after 1956 and, therefore, her interest in the property would devolve as per the scheme in terms of Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Thus, her property will devolve upon her sons, daughters and husband.”

On the holistic view of the matter, the Court found no error with the order of the first Appellate Court. Therefore, the present appeal was dismissed. [Jagannath Waman Undre v. Yamunabai Sitaram Kadam, Second Appeal No. 126 of 2018, decided on 01-04-2019]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *